Israel News Digest
DAVID DOLAN,
Christian Friends of Israel
September, 2001
"I am the Lord, I have called you in righteousness. I will also
hold you by the hand and watch over you." (Isaiah 42:6)
PALESTINIAN ATTACKS MOVE MIDEAST BACK TO THE BRINK
Israeli and international attempts to persuade Yasser Arafat to keep
his June commitment to arrest around 100 known Islamic terrorists bore no
fruit during August. Instead, major suicide assaults were launched in
Jerusalem and Haifa, resulting in the deaths of 15 civilians - four of them
children, three teenage girls and a pregnant woman - and the wounding of over
150 others, several critically. The attacks provoked world condemnation of
Arafat's failure to curb such atrocities, but also the usual rebukes against
the Jewish State for being unwilling to just roll over and play dead in the
face of such horrendous assaults. Adding bold insult to severe injury, two
PLO members later took part in a daring overnight raid on an Israeli army
base in the Gaza Strip, leaving three soldiers dead and seven wounded.
The veteran Palestinian leader responded to the terrorist atrocities
by demanding, and getting, emergency United Nations and Arab League meetings
during the month. They were designed to put additional pressure on the
Israeli government to accept some sort of international force to be
stationed between Israeli-held territory and Palestinian self-government
zones. The proposed force is not intended to protect innocent Israeli
children and adults being shot dead while driving on roads, or slaughtered
or maimed by suicide bombers while eating in restaurants, or standing
outside shops or nightclubs. Instead, world troops would guard the very
areas and people from which the Palestinian attackers originate. To his
credit, US President George Bush ordered his UN ambassador to veto the
Palestinian resolution, effectively killing it, at least for now.
Coming on the heels of the massive explosion that took 21 young lives
in Tel Aviv on June 1, Arafat had pledged in writing to curb Islamic
terrorist bombings as part of the ceasefire pact ironed out by visiting
American CIA chief, George Tenet. According to the agreement, which was also
signed by Israel, the Mitchell Committee recommendations for ending the
violent Palestinian "Al Aksa uprising" and returning to the peace
table, would only be implemented once escalating terrorist assaults come to
an end. Israel would give Arafat a list of known Hamas and Islamic Jihad
attackers, and the Palestinian leader would see to it that they were put
behind bars. Israel sent such a list to Arafat in early July. On it was
Abdullah Barghouti; the man who officials say was behind the August 9
massacre in the heart of Jerusalem. Of course, Palestinian security forces
did not arrest him either before or after the attack, nor any of the other
named extremists.
STILL DREAMING
The failed Tenet Agreement was just another in a series of absurd
international proposals that formed the enormously flawed basis for the
failed Oslo Peace Accords. It should have been patently obvious to anyone
with even a casual understanding of how the Islamic world operates-which
should include the American intelligence community, one would assume-that
the latest Arafat pledge was as worthless as all those he had made as part
of the US-supported Oslo peace process.
It was precisely the PLO leader's quite appropriate fear of Hamas and
Islamic Jihad's growing power and widespread influence, that led him to
reject former Israeli Prime Minister, Ehud Barak's far-reaching final status
peace proposals at Camp David in July, 2000, and revert to the well-oiled
warpath. These Muslim groups, and others like them, have only gained
additional credibility and public backing during the violent "holy
war" that began last September-a fact reflected in recent Palestinian
opinion polls. The fanatics are financially and logistically supported by
several regional countries, meaning they will always be able to recruit and
train new "martyrs" for their jihad battle to destroy the detested
"Zionist entity." Most importantly, they will forever pose a
deadly threat to any Palestinian leader who would dare to seriously stand in
their way. After all, they are terrorist organizations who specialize in
wiping out anyone who opposes their holy war agendas. Of all people, Arafat
understands what that means, having cut his teeth in the international
terrorist arena.
With these facts in mind, the veteran Palestinian leader has never tried
very hard to crack down on Muslim militants. Instead, he predictably played
to the many in his overwhelmingly Islamic population who could never accept
a Jewish State in the heart of the Arab-Muslim Middle East.
That Arafat would focus on currying favor with Muslim fundamentalists,
despite his Oslo commitments, was already clear in 1994 when he told an
international Islamic audience in South Africa that "jihad for the
liberation of Jerusalem will continue until our Palestinian flag flies over
every inch of our holy city." He confirmed this path in 1996 when he
hailed the Hamas and Islamic Jihad suicide terrorists who carried out
attacks in Jerusalem and Tel Aviv as "heroic martyrs for our
cause." This pro-Islamic-extremist position was reiterated later that
year when Israel opened a tourist tunnel along the excavated northwestern
wall of the Temple Mount. Realizing that it hardly harmed Palestinian
interests, Arafat nonetheless stroked Muslim passions and fears by accusing
Israel of further attempts to "Judaize our capital city" and of
plotting to dig underneath the mount from the newly opened tunnel in order
to cause its mosques to collapse! His incendiary comments helped stir up a
week of rioting that left many Palestinian and Israelis either dead or
wounded.
HEART OF THE MATTER
It was inevitable that fanatic Islamic bombers would once again do their
dirty deed in Jerusalem, as they did in early June and late last year. After
all, their desire to emulate the original Arabian Muslim warriors by taking
the holy city for Allah is hardly a hidden one. With almost every breath,
jihad-driven militants throughout the Middle East and the entire world
demand an end to Jewish control over Jerusalem, whose heart is the ancient
Temple Mount situated inside the walled Old City. Many do more than that:
They are preparing to fight, or are already actively engaged in, the violent
"holy war" struggle. Among the warriors are some one million Iraqi
soldiers (official sources in Baghdad claim seven million
"volunteers" are waiting in the wings to "liberate"
Jerusalem, but Israeli officials say that figure is probably greatly
exaggerated). Significant numbers can also be found in Lebanon, Syria,
Sudan, Libya, Afghanistan, and elsewhere around this troubled, historic
region.
The August 9 attack at the always-crowded downtown corner of Jaffa Road and
King George Street was particularly cruel in that it targeted a well known,
popular family restaurant at lunchtime. It was bound to take the lives of
children, their mothers and fathers, the elderly, other ordinary Israelis
and even a few tourists, which it did.
The suicide blast wiped out half of the Schijveschurder family that
had immigrated to Israel from Holland. Among the dead were both adult
parents, their 14-year-old teenage daughter, a 4-year-old son and a
2-year-old girl. Stirring pictures of an older surviving brother trying to
comfort his orphaned 10-year-old sister after they had just visited another
8-year-old sister at a local hospital-the only family member eating in the
pizzeria to survive the carnage-will not quickly be forgotten by most
Israelis. All joined in their anguished grief over the senseless slaughter.
The nationally televised testimony of their grandmother, who survived
several Nazi concentration camps in the early 1940's only to see her
offspring perish decades later in a horrendous blast in the center of
Judaism's holiest city, will remain etched in many minds as well.
Another small family was deeply affected by the suicide blast. A 39-year-old
mother from Jerusalem and her 8-year-old daughter, recent immigrants from
the former Soviet Union, were both killed in the attack. A Jewish boy, just
10, and a 62-year-old mother and grandmother also perished in the explosion.
Possibly the most moving accounts of the terrible attack came from the
staff of the Sbarro Italian restaurant, where 23-year-old Izzadin Masri
strategically blew himself to bits and pieces for the sake of Allah and
Palestine. Employees related that the always-busy fast food outlet had a
staff of nine Jews and nine Arabs before the powerful blast took the life of
19-year-old Jewish waitress and cashier Tehila Maoz. The surviving staff,
some recovering from their wounds and all unemployed since their pizzeria
was totally destroyed, testified that they had worked well together despite
the ongoing crisis between their two peoples. Most said they especially
liked the friendly Maoz, who had just traded cash registers with an Arab
employee, sealing her fate since it placed her closer to Masri and his
insidious hidden bomb.
The Israeli public was sickened to see Arafat's television stations
showing thousands of local and regional Arabs dancing in glee over the
Jerusalem slaughter. Feelings of revulsion were only compounded when the
stations later broadcast interviews with Masri's family, praising him for
joining the growing list of "holy martyrs" who have taken innocent
lives, as well as their own.
MORE THAN STATISTICS
These are just a few of the stories behind the international news headlines
that clinically reported "15 People Killed in Jerusalem Bombing."
Two other widely published facts also touched the Israeli people. One
involved a visiting American woman. Indeed, the death toll should really
read 16 instead of 15 since Judith Greenbaum, a 30-year-old Jewish tourist
from New Jersey, was 5 months pregnant when she was suddenly killed. She had
been in Israel for several months studying at a local college. Sadly, the
developing baby went from its mother's comforting womb to her dirt-covered
tomb.
Another fatality was a well-liked 15-year-old girl who held duo
Israeli and Australian citizenship (her mother was originally from the
United States). Malka Roth, an accomplished violinist, died next to her best
friend, Michal Raziel, a native of Jerusalem who helped care for her young
mentally handicapped sister. The two 15-year-old teens had been nearly
inseparable since Roth emigrated with her family from Melbourne in 1988. On
their way to a youth meeting in the Talpiot industrial zone in south
Jerusalem after decorating the room of another friend flying in later that
day from abroad, they had stopped by the Sbarro restaurant to meet a fourth
friend. There, they would perish standing side by side. After arriving at
Ben Gurion airport, their traveling teenage friend sobbed uncontrollably
when told of the tragic and untimely end of Malka and Michal's young lives,
later discovering they had left "welcome home" signs and balloons
in her room as their final testimony of friendship toward her.
The Jerusalem deaths, occurring at a well-known kosher restaurant that
most residents of the city have probably visited, or at least walked by at
some point, brought to 155 the number of Israelis killed since the violent
uprising was launched last September 28 (the terrorist murders of three
soldiers in the Gaza Strip and a couple driving home outside of Jerusalem on
August 25 brought the toll to 160). Most of the dead have been innocent
civilians killed while carrying out the daily routines of their lives. Over
1,500 others have been injured, a number for life. Over 500 Palestinians
have also perished, most of them while directly involved in violent attacks
or in immediate military reactions to the same. Others were known terrorist
activists who were deliberately targeted by Israeli forces in an attempt to
halt their attacks. Some were innocent bystanders caught up in the
crossfire. However, only a handful, if that, were the apparent victims of
Jewish revenge attacks. None were killed by Israeli suicide bombers, since
such people do not exist.
Islamic militant attempts to raise the Jewish death toll continued
later in the month. Just five days after the deadly Jerusalem blast, a
suicide attacker blew himself up in a quiet restaurant outside of the port
city of Haifa, injuring 15 people. Some would have undoubtedly perished had
the terrorist not brazenly raised his shirt to display a bomb strapped to
his body, asking a startled waitress, "Do you know what this is?"
The waitress screamed out "Terrorist!" which gave nearby patrons a
few seconds to move away from the hellish blast which followed. A week
later, Israeli police intercepted a Palestinian trying to smuggle another
bomb into Haifa. Some days before that, a young suicide attacker attempted
to board a packed public bus south of the Jordan Valley town of Beit She'an.
The alert driver pushed the terrorist off the bus after noticing a wire
protruding from his duffle bag. The Palestinian tried, and failed, to
trigger his bomb while falling backwards to the ground.
A small bomb exploded in Jerusalem on August 21 under the front hood
of a car parked outside of a restaurant just two blocks east of the
destroyed Sbarro eatery. For obvious reasons, the dozen patrons inside-which
included a Christian resident of Jerusalem who represents a pro-Israel
ministry based in Germany and a British-born pastor just ending his service
with the city's King of Kings congregation-had avoided sitting near the
outer windows of the restaurant, which were blown in by the blast. A far
more powerful bomb, planted in the back trunk of the car, failed to explode.
Police said it was probably meant to go off soon after the smaller explosion
took place, in time to kill or maim dozens of security and medical personnel
who were dutifully arriving at the scene.
ORIENT HOUSE
As they did after the outrageous Tel Aviv slaughter of young innocents in
early June, senior Israeli government ministers urgently huddled together to
discuss the Sbarro attack and their response to it. Prime Minister Ariel
Sharon wanted to immediately order his armed forces to carry out a military
plan of action devised in the wake of the Tel Aviv assault. However, Foreign
Minister Shimon Peres-one of the strongest devotees of the now-discredited
Oslo peace process-once again vetoed the operation (he has the legal power
to do that as head of the largest party in Sharon's national unity
government). However, another Labor party politician, Defense Minister
Binyamin Ben Eliezer, backed the military operation.
In its place, Peres approved the dispatch of F-16 fighter aircraft for
a second time in the current uprising, to bomb Palestinian positions in the
town of Ramallah (they struck again in late August in the Gaza Strip after
the terrorist infiltration that left three soldiers dead). The target was
chosen because Arafat had scheduled a meeting there with senior Hamas and
Islamic Jihad leaders the night of the Jerusalem blast. The purpose: To
discuss the formal inclusion of the militant groups in his autonomy
government. Israeli leaders wanted to show their displeasure over the fact
that the aging PLO chief was not just failing to keep his June commitment to
arrest known Muslim terrorists, but was actually planning to invite their
leaders into his ruling circle! Despite the fact that the parley was
postponed after both groups took "credit" for the hideous Sbarro
attack, Israeli jets struck the Palestinian police headquarters in Ramallah
early the next morning. However, the move was mostly for show since Sharon
and his senior ministers knew that all Palestinian government buildings in
Arafat's zones of control had been evacuated in anticipation of an Israeli
response.
Meeting soon afterwards in special session, Sharon asked his entire
cabinet to approve his decision to order a major political retaliation-the
closure of Arafat's unofficial government house that has operated north of
Jerusalem's walled Old City since before the Oslo accords were signed in
1993. Both Peres and Ben Eliezer had earlier nixed the move in the inner
cabinet. They argued that it would only deflect world attention from the
terrorist massacre and give Arafat more political ammunition in his drive to
impose international forces on Israel. However, since it was not a military
response, Sharon was free to take his intention to shut down "Orient
House" before the full cabinet, which overwhelmingly endorsed the
closure.
Doing away with the eastern Jerusalem Palestinian government center
has been a major Likud party goal for some years, even though former Likud
Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu only felt strong enough to order such
action just before he was swept from power, thus thwarting its
implementation. All other right wing and religious parties have long called
for the center's closure, seeing the ongoing operation of Orient House as a
clear violation of the Oslo Accords. They noted that Arafat had agreed he
would have no political authority over any part of Jerusalem, at least not
before a Final Status Peace Accord was arrived at. Palestinian leaders have
long argued that Orient House was not connected to Arafat's autonomy
government. But, their frequent attempts to officially receive foreign
dignitaries there gave the lie to that contention.
In the end, the closure, carried out by Jerusalem police, did not
cause most of the local and international ripples anticipated by Peres and
his nervous party. The American government and others did condemn the move
as "unnecessary and provocative political escalation." Yet all
seemed relieved that the Israeli response to the atrocious Jerusalem blast
was not something that could spark an all out war in the region.
US Secretary of State Colin Powell urged Sharon to quickly reverse the
closure order. The Israeli leader replied that it was really "a matter
of law enforcement" rather than war by other means. But he did
acknowledge his hope that this action would be a signal to Arafat that he
"has much more to lose, if he continues to do nothing to stop the
rising terrorist attacks" upon the Israeli public.
Meanwhile, local Arab response was rather mundane, with only a few
dozen activists, led by Hannan Ashrawi, turning out to protest the closure
in the days following its implementation. In fact, many more Israeli
left-wing demonstrators and journalists gathered almost daily near the site
than did Palestinians. This may be because most Arab residents of Jerusalem,
especially many Christians and well-educated Muslims, are not really longing
to be placed under Arafat's autocratic control. Indeed, fears that they may
eventually find themselves under his despotic sway probably help explain a
recent sharp upturn in the number of Jerusalem Arabs applying for visas to
move to the United States and elsewhere.
THE MASTER PLAN
As I reported via e-mail the day after the Tel Aviv attack, the three-stage
military operation that PM Sharon wanted to unleash immediately after the
terrorist slaughter in the center of Jerusalem, begins with ground forces
entering Palestinian-controlled territory to arrest Islamic militants. The
plan has been code-named "Operation Oranim" or "Pine
Trees" by the army, but dubbed by Arafat as "Operation Hell."
Jihad warriors would be expected to put up fierce armed resistance. However,
this would not be militarily significant unless they were supported by
thousands of armed PLO, Fatah, and Tanzim militiamen.
The big question mark in such an operation is the response of the tens
of thousands of heavily armed Palestinian "policemen" serving in
Arafat's Oslo-sanctioned paramilitary forces (the numbers are around twice
as many as allowed under the crumbled peace accords). If, as expected,
Arafat's highly-trained men joined the fray, then Phase Two of the army plan
would come into play: A direct assault on his Palestinian autonomy
government, including broadcasting stations, the airport near Gaza City, and
many other official targets. This action would undoubtedly bring down the
verbal wrath of the entire Muslim world, and probably most everyone else as
well. The remaining question mark is how regional Islamic states like Egypt,
Jordan, Syria and Iraq might respond, and what public and private stands the
US and the European Union would take.
Phase Three would depend on outside Arab and Muslim world reaction. It
is considered likely that Saddam Hussein would order his "Jerusalem
liberation army" to fight for Arafat (they were sent out into the
streets in mid-August in an anti-Zionist and pro-Palestinian show sponsored
by the brutal Iraqi regime). Even if Saddam could only field around one
million men, as most Israeli analysts guess, it would be a significant force
to deal with, especially if Israel were basically acting alone. Iraqi forces
could pose a significant threat if they successfully crossed into Jordan,
headed for that country's long shared border with Israel, either with or
without the approval of the Hashemite government in Amman. (Internet
reports, that a thousand or more Iraqi troops infiltrated the country in
late July, have remained unconfirmed here in Jerusalem, with most Israeli
security experts saying they were probably exaggerated at best. However
there are definite indications that Saddam has smuggled in some underground
agents with orders to help local Palestinian groups topple the pro-Western
Jordanian monarchy).
If Iranian-backed Hizbullah militiamen, who have completely taken over
all of southern Lebanon since Israeli forces evacuated the area in May 2000,
and/or Syrian troops entered the conflict-also considered a very real
possibility- then Israel would probably attempt to completely shut down
Arafat's autonomy government. The PLO chief would be sent packing, while
Israel's outnumbered, but not outclassed, military machine worked to repulse
all the regional forces fighting on his behalf. Syrian leaders again vowed
in August to defend the Palestinians "against growing Israeli
aggression." The statements came after the Assad regime followed
Saddam's lead and organized mass pro-Palestinian demonstrations around the
country.
Shimon Peres did agree to approve a "test" of the army's
ability to carry out Operation Pines. After the August 12 Haifa attack, a
column of army tanks was sent into the Arafat-ruled town of Jenin, located
in northern Samaria near the Israeli Jezreel Valley. The official excuse for
the military foray was the fact that the dead suicide bomber had come from
the town, as have at least seven other attackers in recent months. Around a
dozen tanks rumbled into the center of Jenin-the first army incursion into
Palestinian-controlled territory outside of the Gaza Strip. The tanks did
encounter fierce light-arms resistance, but it proved ineffective against
the expensive armored vehicles. The tanks withdrew after blowing up Jenin's
Palestinian police headquarters (another message aimed directly at Arafat).
Israeli forces were also poised a few days later to enter the
Palestinian-ruled towns of Beit Jala and Bethlehem, south of Jerusalem. The
order to surround the towns came after professional Arab sharpshooters once
again attacked the nearby Gilo neighborhood. Israeli officials said the
attack was launched from several directions, in some cases hitting apartment
buildings that had previously been spared (one bullet lodged in a wall just
above the bed of an American Christian minister and his wife). An Israeli
man was wounded in the eye by bullet shrapnel.
However, the army incursion was called off at the last minute after
American leaders pressured Ariel Sharon to desist, and persuaded Arafat to
order his gunmen to stand down (which they have done until this writing,
proving once again that he can control at least most of the violence if he
wants to). Still, Israeli forces remain poised for action just outside of
the towns, ready to act if firing upon Gilo resumes.
CYCLE OF VIOLENCE?
Doing nothing to stop the latest barrage of terrorist attacks, but instead
only encouraging more of the same, most governments around the world
condemned the Palestinian terrorist attacks while equally upbraiding the
Israeli government for its responses to the same. Typical was this State
Department reaction after the Sbarro massacre and the subsequent closure of
Orient House: "We call upon both sides to refrain from actions that
will further inflame passions in the area and contribute to the cycle of
violence." A similar statement followed the Tel Aviv slaughter. Thus,
carefully-planned Israeli military attempts to counter a wave of terrorist
massacres that have left dozens of women, men, teenagers and children
dead-aimed not at civilians, but at the terrorists themselves-are equated
with the atrocities that provoked them.
Although such politically correct statements may help ensure
continuing Arab oil supplies to America, they can only further enflame the
region. Such "evenhanded" statements-denouncing the reactions of a
democratic state under siege with its demented attackers-can only encourage
Arafat and his minions to think that their attempts to goad Israel into a
major military response (which would naturally be strongly denounced by the
world) will work in the end. Thankfully, President Bush himself does not
seem to be parroting the immoral line taken by his "balanced"
State Department.
Palestinian apologists like Hannan Ashrawi and Saib Erekat constantly
portray the Mideast situation as just the opposite of what it is. In their
oft-repeated version of reality, it is the Israelis who are violating the
Oslo accords and carrying out "state-sponsored terrorist atrocities
against unarmed civilians." But Western leaders and media outlets
should keep in mind what the basic facts are: The Israeli government was at
the point of ceding most of Judaism's remaining biblical heartland-deeply
loved by many Jews-to Arafat last summer, along with the entire Gaza Strip.
This was despite the fact that the PLO leader had hailed earlier suicide
bombers, refused to stop incitement in his media and reduce his armed forces
to agreed-upon numbers, and encouraged the 1996 and May 2000 Palestinian
riots that left many dead and wounded.
It was the Palestinian "president" who flatly turned down
Ehud Barak's painful, far-reaching Final Status peace proposals, as
confirmed by Bill Clinton and other American officials. Soon afterwards,
Arafat's television began to screen frequent scenes of earlier uprisings and
terrorist attacks, hailing the participants as "true sons of
Palestine." (I watched them myself many times last summer.) Of course,
such scenes were deliberately designed to encourage a repetition of the
same, especially among the young and impressionable. When the new
Palestinian holy war "spontaneously broke out" last September 28,
it was immediately named "the Al Aksa intifada" by Arafat. This
clearly linked it to the Islamic desire to pursue not peace with the hated
"Zionist entity," but jihad war for Jerusalem.
WAR AND PEACE
Israeli intelligence officials reportedly gave the government a secret
assessment in early August-that another major war could erupt in the tense
Middle East in the coming year. Barring that, they see nothing but a dismal
continuation of Palestinian violence for many years to come. Meanwhile,
polls show the Israeli public is fast losing confidence that PM Sharon can
bring an end to the bloodshed. Tourism is down almost 60%, and even more if
family visits by Israelis living abroad are factored out. All this as water
experts warn that the taps will soon run dry if conservation is not stepped
up, even if the coming winter brings good rainfall.
Still, Jewish immigration has continued this year despite the
violence, even if at slightly lower numbers. And anyway, it has always been
the Lord's apparent choice to deal with His difficult, special people only
after they call out to Him for help. Such a time seems to be drawing near
for the despised and outnumbered-but ultimately not forsaken-people of
reborn Israel.
More TruthNews
|